Thursday, 1 April 2010
Group at Work
Wednesday, 31 March 2010
Channan Screen Grabs
Shot 1
This particular shot has the conventions of the use of a hand held camera shot. We chose to use the effect of hand held shooting because it will make the audience feel like they are walking with the character, thus it showing to be an over the shoulder shot.
Shot 2
This shot has many conventions to that of social realist films, such Long shots. This Long shot shown in the image below could not be planned and so the actor had to improvise many time sin order for us3 to gain an authentic and real effect. In terms of the location we tried to show the locality of where our opening was taking place. Most openings are filmed in known places to the audience and this is what we took heed of when shooting in the train station, the train station was Tulse Hill which is fairly known. The location is in contrast to that of the character. the character is made to stereotype the youths of today fairly related to gang culture and the different aspects into how the audience and people how relate to this characters portrayal.

The characters isolation is shown evidently with no one else surrounding him. Conventionally these aspects are in relation to the working class of today and we challenge this because we focus on the characters individual. We stick to the general conventions though with location having the graffiti on the walls. We develop this shot by having many other contrast as well such as the lighting in the shot. On the left hand side it seems more lighter but on the right it reveals to be a more shaded. Overall for these two shots I think we manipulated these conventions into our own to portray the Genre and relation to the aduience.
Adeel Screen Grabs
Snap Analysis
I will be analyzing two different snap shots taken from our British social realist film: Brother. In this piece I will be identifying various elements which help portray the genre and feel to our film.
To begin with here is a snap taken of a long shot of Kasper played by Olly Merson. I believe this is a very powerful shot as it shows Kasper rising up the stairs in a black hoody, this automatically gives our character a sense of importance, as he is the only individual in the center of the shot. This shot conforms to the British social realist genre in many ways, for example we have chosen to give it a very cold and gloomy look through the use of using a blue filter this helps us set the mood of the scene- the mise en scene helps depict negativity. This can be seen by the characters dark clothing, this represents the character to the audience as a dark and isolated individual-this is also evident due to no one being within the environment where he usually is. The characters dressing sense also conforms to the stereotypical representation of South London Youths, this was done in order for a wide range of young audiences to relate to the character.
The shot was taken in Tulse Hill Station, 
Below is another shot of the same character, as he is walking through another train station. In comparison to the shot before it is evident that there is now more lighting - this is mainly due to the fact we want the audience to be aware of the environment as the next scene is going to be quite powerful and intense. The intensity of the following sequence is supported by some of the things portrayed in the mise en scene, for example, Ollie is yet again in an isolated area - the clock which is in the center of the shot, is within a red frame; the colour red itself has connotations of danger therefore warning the audience as well as symbolizing the arrival of something threatening. For this particular shot, what really conforms to the conventions of our film would be the isolation of this character - we have used a long shot to almost exaggerate the fact that he is so isolated in such a big train station
Hector Screen Grabs
This still from our opening 'Mon Frere', is an example of conformity to the genre of British social realism. In terms of mise en scene, the use of a blue filter generates the atmosphere of being depressing, dull and real which is a technique often used in social realism's, for example 'Nil by mouth'. The camera shot only exposes part of the scene which limits what the viewer can see making them uncomfortable. The use of a close up makes the shot graphic and by using graphic features it makes the opening feel more real. Generally speaking the costume is effective when attempting to conform to the stereotype seen on different cultures in
Olly grab.
Shot 2:
This still taken from 'Mon Frere' helped our film conform to our chosen genre of British social realism. It conforms in more technical terms like filters and shot type rather than mise en scene. We used a blue filter which if often used in used social realisms to create the depressed, quite atmosphere. In Gary Goldmans 'Nil by mouth' and Jo Carnahan's 'Narc' the use of a blue filter is used to represent isolation and when referring back to the close up in our film its evident this atmosphere is being portrayed as its a close up showing only one character.
The cast chosen was vital in order to represent the British culture and what stereotype he's conforming to. We aimed for the careless, young adult stereotype and did this by carefully selecting features like haircut, facial features, clothing. His shaved head conforms to this stereotype as it shows he's not capable to controlling a styled hair cut and makes him look more urban and rough. We used Vicks under his eyes to make his eyes slightly swollen and make him appear tired, rough and clearly show he's distressed. Referring back to our genre, British realism's document the lives of real Brits living in poverty or domestic violence which of ten puts the character under severe stress and has to portray them in this way using several techniques.
Monday, 29 March 2010
Final Screening- Brother
After making changes from our previous screening we have come to our final screening.
This screening was a way in which we could gain feedback and comments in relation to the film and mostly the changes we made. Yet again we had problems saving but we managed to over come this problem.
We produced a short Questionnaire based upon our footage and the changes we made based upon our last questionnaire we filled out.. We asked general questions from which we could gain the audiences opinon and also their critiscism. In our Questionnaire there were questions.
Verbal Feedback:
Written Feedback:
Good
Liked the foot transistion and the sound effect at the end. (fight scene)
The beep noise and the fight sounds creations
The arguement between the two guys good
Conrad scene showed pretty well in comparison, the blue fiulters and white flashes yet again makes it effective in portraying the character
The fade of music into different scenes was good
Reshoots were effective
Use of similar characters
Title fade to black
Bad:
Confusing as to what character is who.
Continuity was slighlt lacked
Flashes were not continous but cold have been longer
Title could have flashed in rather than fade in , to make it cointrast the white flashes
The train sequnce is not as striong as the first sequence, hard to differriate
Lack of lighting could ba a problem...
Sunday, 28 March 2010
Filming Day 3
We decided that we would go back and re-shoot some of our scenes based upon the feedback we gained from our first screening. A major change we made as introducing a new character to the sequence. W introduced Olly into the sequence in order to make the two scenes we have merge. We ensured that we made Olly slightly similar to Will. With this change our storyline kinda changes as well. With this character we tried many of the same shots as only but reenacting them as a mirror effect. The benefit was that we caught the same lighting as the Will shot and so they Were not too different. We say this change as a positive aspect as we all chipped in and really engaged in making the sequence better that before.
First Screening
Today we screened our Opening Sequence to an audience. This screening was a way ion which we could gain feedback and comments in relation to the film. When trying to screen our opening, we encountered many problems such as, when editing our footage and adding the titles and credits we came to noticed that we could not save our sequence. This proved to be a serious problem as we had made editing changes and if these were lost our footage as whole could be affected and the audience may not receive the same effect as we would have hoped. In the end we screened our opening sequence on a smaller screen that we was working on.
We produced a short Questionnaire based upon our footage. We asked general questions form which we could gain the audiences opinion and also their criticise. In our questionnaire there were 5 questions
Feedback: The Nervous bit
There were two types of feedback we received, Verbal Feedback and Written Feedback.
Verbal Feedback
When given the chance the audience were able to tell us verbally what things they liked about the film. We were given credit for the use of the blue filter in the fist ha;f of the opening scene. Also the use of our camera shots, like the train station shots were considered to be effective. The fact that our footage was flowing really well showed the audience that we had a solid continuity effect. The use of the loud music in the 2nd scene was very effective and seemed to correlate to the actual footage and what was happening in those scenes. The use of the natural sounds in the first half e.g the birds in the background gave the film a feel of realism.
The written feedback that we received was very positive overall. We were congratulated on the use off effects such as the White light flash to cut into different scenes. Also the use of our different camera shots such as over the shoulder shots when Will was walking through the tunnel. We were commented positively on how our camera shots worked really well in contrast with the music. The music was really a good factor as well because it was evident to see that it was non diagetic. Again we were credited for our use of the blue filter in the first scenes of the opening.
The comments made regarding things the audience did not like and did not find effective was again the cut between the zoom in the sky shot and then to the when Will is walking through the station; this scene also hand diagetic sounds of people talking and this could be considered as a filming error. Also the change in these scenes is also evident from how the colour of both scenes are in contrast their for making the two scenes seem not linked. We were also commented on the ending and how it was abrupt .
Naming Our Film
Editing- The Titles
Using Live Type
Channan Learnt how to use Live Type and found that we could achieve various effects such as a shadow that ripples. However constructing the titles were easy in this program but previewing it was not at an advantage as we could not use the footage at the same time and so Paul and Channan Had to preview it on a white canvas. By using Live Type we got a vague idea on What we wanted our credits and titles to be. lt took the time to research different fonts and try apply it to our film.
We came to realise that in order to transfer the credits to the footage would take a long time and would be time consuming as well as cause technical difficulties. As the editing process continued the timings required for the credits kept changing. Another problem we encountered was Live Type's lack of basic effects their effects were always advanced and over the top. There was no facility to use fade on a text which was the look we initially wanted. We decided to simply input the text straight into Final Cut after the majority of the editing was finished. We laid the text on a black canvas and made the text stand out by making in white. When changing to live cut it was more easier to preview the effect and position it to where we wanted.
Written By Channan and Paul
Posted by Channan Toussaint
Editing- The Footage
During the production of 'Mon Fere' we used the software Final cut premiere. Initially our group had no idea on how to use the software but after some tutorial sessions we felt we had the basic skills needed to produce our opening film. The reason why we used final Cut premiere is that it is a very complex software and it enables us to use many functions and apply many professional looking techniques to our footage. It gave us the freedom when editing
- File rendering
- Transition Effects
- Imagery
- Audio
- Overall Control over the time line
Although Editing was an effective process, there were many major inconveniences that occurred. First of all it was not until our second editing session that our footage was uploaded. This was because our camera was not compatible with final cut due to dropped frames. To overcome this problem we had to import our footage into I-Movie and then upload it into Final Cut. We also encountered problems such as audio, where the natural audio were not as effective as we hoped and so we had to make alterations to this. We also had frame rate problems due to the camera.
Filming Days
Day 1:
We decided to film at our first Location Paul's house. At first we wasn't sure on how to make our film opening come to live in front of us and so this day was really about testing out different shots we could use as well as seeing how we can manipulate our location in order to make it portray the film genre as well as our storyline. In the scenes that we shot we only needed our first character which was Conrad. As already stated he played the youth worker. Our storyline for Conrad was that he would be a youth Worker with clear problems that could be picked up on by the audience and so we deliberately made him look messy and unattractive. To do this we requested that this cast member shave their head and we smudged toothpaste on the side of his mouth to make it look real dirty. Overall many shots were taken of this cast member displaying the character in many ways. Overall this first day of filming was really productive based upon the group as a whole knowing what we would do next in terms of the next scene.
Day 2:
Our second Location was the train station scene, for this scene we would need Will. For this scene we had already thought of many good ideas and so we made them effective by carrying them out and seeing what went wrong and what went right. We managed to carry out effective filming and carry out a range of shots to use in our opening. We did have one minor issue and that was the change in light but this we could not change and so we made the use of hat we had. We had shots such as tracking shots , close ups and medium shots to display this character to the audience. The reason why we carried out so many shots was to see if the shots could affect the audience and how they would perceive it.
Thursday, 11 March 2010
The Crew
Adeel Ikram
Filming Changes
- The filming locations
- Audio Suggestions
- The Cast

Monday, 1 March 2010
Presentation
Monday, 15 February 2010
Casting: Who and Why
- Whether they conformed to the stereotypes we are portraying
- Whether they have some relation to the character they are playing
- Whether their appearance will conform to the stereotype that we are portraying.
- The unnamed youth worker.
- Young DJ
- 3 Males for a fight Scene

